World's longest flight live updates: Preparing for take off

World's longest flight live updates: Preparing for take off
Singapore (CNN) — Spending nearly 19 hours cooped up in an airplane may sound nightmarish to some, but when Singapore Airlines flight SQ22 takes off from its home airport bound for New York, it's going to be a dream for others.
The record-breaking flight, involving a brand-new Airbus A350-900ULR (Ultra Long Range), will usher in a new era for air passengers and make the world just that bit smaller as it becomes the world's longest scheduled nonstop service.
For aviation fanatics like myself, it rarely gets more exciting.
I'm lucky enough to have a ticket for this inaugural flight and I'll be live-reporting my experiences as we depart from Singapore's Changi Airport, then fly northeast towards Alaska before landing in Newark Liberty International Airport, just outside of New York.
Take off is scheduled for 11:35 p.m. Singapore time (11:35 a.m. in New York, 4:35 p.m. in London) on Thursday October 11 and, all being well, we'll be wheels-down on the other side of the planet the following day, Friday at 6 a.m. in New York (11:00 a.m. in London, 6 p.m. Singapore).
But what will it be like to spend more than 18 hours in the air? How does the human body cope? How do the cabin crew cope? How do the airplane's bathrooms cope?
I'll be charting my observations -- good and bad -- and those of my 160 fellow passengers as we make aviation history.
Keep checking this story for live updates as we travel the 16,700 kilometers (10,376 miles) to our destination.
In the meantime, you can read more about the super-efficient aircraft we'll be flying, and the journey we'll be taking, here.
But first, a few words on what exactly is meant by the world's longest flight.
It seems so easy, but it isn't.
There are various ways to define it, with pedants arguing for hours over what it means.
Related content
17 hours in the air? World's longest airline routes
Of course there is the distance flown. Then there's the duration of the flight. Sometimes strong head winds can mean a shorter distance takes longer and vice versa.
However, we're usually safe saying the longest flights are measured when the plane is flying the Great Circle Route: the shortest distance between two points on the globe.
For instance: flying from New York to London, the plane doesn't go straight out over the ocean because that would mean flying at the wider part of the Earth's circumference.
Rather, the plane heads north, making an arc past Canada, Greenland and Iceland, and down across Ireland into London.
With that in mind, these are the commonly accepted world's longest flights:
Singapore to New York   

Singapore Airlines to reclaim world's longest airline route: On October 11, 2018, Singapore Airlines new Airbus A350-900ULR will go into service between Singapore and New York. The 19-hour trip will become the world's longest non-stop flight route.
Airbus
Previously operated by Singapore Airlines using an Airbus A340-500, this flight took 18 hours to get to Newark.
It ended up being an all-business class flight. The A340-500 is a four-engine, heavy and thirsty aircraft. When fuel prices rose to more than $100 per barrel, this flight stopped being profitable. (Remember: the longer the flight, the more fuel becomes a proportion of the cost!)
Related content
The making of the airplane seats for the world's longest flight
By 2013 Singapore Airlines took advantage of an agreement to hand back the planes to Airbus, thereby ending the route.
Now, five years later, equipped with the more fuel-efficient A350-900 Ultra Long Haul, the airline can once again fly direct from Singapore to New York and make money.
From October 11, hands-down this will be, without controversy, the longest regularly scheduled nonstop commercial flight in the world.
Perth to London
Since 1947, the journey from Australia to London has been known as The Kangaroo Route. Back then, several hops were involved -- Sydney, Darwin, Singapore, Calcutta, Karachi, Cairo, Castel Benito, Rome, London -- and took some four days to complete.
And that was considered speedy.
Related content
From 10 days to nonstop: How London to Australia flights have changed
This year Qantas did the run all in one long hop, when a Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner made the journey in just over 17 hours.
There have been other aircraft capable of this distance, like the Boeing 777-200LR, Airbus A380 and A340-500, but they are heavier planes with more seats than required. It would have been difficult to make money on this "long thin route."
Other flights in the top 10
Qantas' Sydney-Dallas using the A380, Qatar's Doha-Auckland, Emirates' Dubai-Auckland, United Airlines running San Francisco-Singapore with a 787-9.
The return of Singapore-New York will put an end to all the rivalry, at least for the moment.
By connecting these two commercial centers on opposite sides of the world, the flight is probably the final long-distance route an airline can conceive to run and remain commercially viable.
Related content
Out of the blue: A look back at Air Force One's classic design
Until Qantas' Project Sunrise comes to fruition.
The Aussie carrier has tasked both Airbus and Boeing to develop long-range aircraft capable of flying 17,000 kilometers nonstop from Sydney to London. Qantas hopes to order the revamped planes by 2019 with flights beginning in 2022.
That journey, if it happens, will clock in at around 20 hours, earning world's longest honors.
The REAL longest flight
Oh, did I say that these were the longest flights?
Because the actual longest flight, according to Guinness World Records, was a 22-hour and 42-minute flight in 2005, from Hong Kong to London.
Boeing was demonstrating the capabilities of its 777-200LR -- nicknamed the Worldliner -- so the flight went the long way round.
I was one of only 30 passengers on board -- Boeing was required to have some paying passengers to meet the criteria for beating the record.
During the nearly day-long trip, we played games, exercised, chatted with the eight pilots on board and slept on mattresses laid out at the back where the seats had been removed.
The flight took off from Hong Kong, crossed the Pacific, making landfall around Los Angeles.
From there, we flew across the United States, crossing over New York's JFK Airport before heading out over the Atlantic and landing in London to a water-cannon salute.
Now THAT was a long flight.
Read More

Teacher banned for claiming extra cash for school trips

Teacher banned for claiming extra cash for school trips
A languages teacher has been banned from the classroom for claiming extra cash from parents for school trips, a conduct panel has concluded.


David Malengela, 41, had responsibility for organising overseas trips at St Peter's School in Huntingdon.

The disciplinary hearing was told he asked parents for additional "behaviour deposits" and charged pupils 20 euros each just to board the coach.

The panel said his actions were "calculated and deliberate".

Read more Cambridgeshire stories

The Teaching Regulation Agency's professional conduct panel was told Congolese Mr Malengela planned three residential trips for the 2017 summer term.

Between February and June 2017, the school's finance team made repeated requests for pupil numbers and money, without success.

The three-member panel was told Mr Malengela wrote to parents to say the £390 cost of a trip to Paris had gone up, citing an "additional £20 refundable behaviour deposit for the Hotel Bon-Sejour".

The tour operator was unaware of the deposit, the hearing learned, and a price increase had not been agreed by the school.

Parents were also asked for an additional payment of 20 euros "to be paid to him personally as the children boarded the coach on departure".

'Serious irregularities'
At a briefing session, he also asked families for a security deposit of 25 euros and money to attend a science museum, the panel found.

In its concluding report, the panel said a "subsequent disciplinary investigation by the school alleged serious irregularities in the administration of the trips".

Mr Malengela resigned in May 2017. The total amount of money he received was not revealed.

The panel concluded the teacher's conduct "fell short of the expected standards of the profession" and "the offence of fraud is relevant".

He was banned from teaching in any school, sixth form college or children's home in England indefinitely.

Mr Malengela has 28 days to appeal.
Read More

Hurricane Michael: Record-breaking 'hell' storm mauls US

Hurricane Michael: Record-breaking 'hell' storm mauls US
The third-strongest storm in recorded history to hit the mainland US has battered north-west Florida, flooding beach towns and snapping trees.

Hurricane Michael made landfall on Wednesday afternoon as a category four storm with 155mph (250km/h) winds in the state's Panhandle region.

Two people, including a child, were killed by falling trees, officials say.

The storm left nearly 500,000 people without electricity in Florida, Alabama and Georgia, emergency services say.

Florida officials said a man was killed when he was crushed by a tree in Gadsden County.

A child died when a tree fell on a home in Seminole County, Georgia, CBS news reports.

Michael earlier reportedly killed at least 13 people as it passed through Central America: six in Honduras, four in Nicaragua and three in El Salvador.
How powerful was Michael when it hit?
Only the unnamed Labor Day hurricane, which hit Florida in 1935, and Hurricane Camille, which struck Mississippi in 1969, made landfall with greater intensity.


The Labor Day storm's barometric pressure (the lower the number, the stronger the storm) was 892 millibars and Camille's was 900, while Michael blew in with 919.

Michael was so powerful as it swept into Florida that it remained a hurricane as it moved further inland.

Its rapid intensification caught many by surprise, although the storm later weakened.

How to survive a monster storm
Are hurricanes getting worse?
A guide to the world's deadliest storms
Unusually warm waters in the Gulf of Mexico turbo-charged the storm from a tropical depression on Sunday.

Only on Tuesday it was a category two hurricane but by Wednesday morning it had reached borderline category five, the highest level.

More than 370,000 people in Florida were ordered to evacuate, but officials believe many ignored the warning.

What happened in Florida?
The hurricane made landfall near Mexico Beach, Florida, at around 14:00 (18:00 GMT) on Wednesday, according to the NHC.

The coastal city of Apalachicola reported a storm surge of nearly 8ft (2.5m).

Read More

Joe Biden hasn't ruled 2020 presidential run out – or in

Joe Biden hasn't ruled 2020 presidential run out – or in
Former Vice President Joe Biden announced that he has no plans to run for president in 2020 “at this point.” Veuer's Natasha Abellard has the story. Buzz60



LONDON – Former Vice President Joe Biden insisted Wednesday that he had not decided whether to challenge Donald Trump for the presidency in 2020.

"I am not a candidate at this point," Biden told USA TODAY after a speech at Chatham House, a London-based global affairs think tank.

Biden passed on an opportunity to run for president after the death of his 46-year-old son, Beau, from cancer in 2015. His name emerged at the top of lists of potential Democratic contenders for president in 2020, along with former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Sens. Cory Booker, Kamala Harris and Kirsten Gillibrand. 

In London, Biden said he was not planning to run against Trump. But he didn't rule it out, saying he "had not made any decisions at this point." Biden has said he would decide by January whether to run.

A Morning Consult-Politico poll over the summer concluded that Biden would beat Trump in a hypothetical matchup in the 2020 presidential election.

Biden predicted in London that the Democratic Party would win control of the House of Representatives and the Senate in next month’s midterm elections, a contest he characterized as "a battle for the soul of America."

"I predict to you that the Democrats will win 40 seats in the House. I also think there is a better than even chance we win the Senate," he said in a Q&A after his address. In a wide-ranging address that covered the United States' "special relationship" with the United Kingdom, as well as the encroaching threats of a more geopolitically assertive China and Russia, Biden said the world was at a "crossroads of competing values," and  "looking inward, turning inward has never, ever worked for us before."

Though Biden did not mention Trump by name, he said a "siren call of phony nationalism" challenges "seven decades of the U.S. underwriting global security" as certain political actors treat "alliances like protection rackets."

Trump has exited or upended trade pacts, withdrawn from the Iran nuclear agreement, abandoned the Paris climate change accord and exacerbated tensions with European Union and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies. 

“Open societies are not self-sustaining,” Biden said. “The system requires constant maintenance.” He said  the world is at an “inflection point” and there is a "contest for the future."  "I have never seen Europe so uncertain and the U.S. in so much doubt," Biden said, referring to Britain's impending departure from the 28-nation EU political bloc, the rise of populist, right-wing governments across the region and intense cultural and political wars at home that span the economy, courts, immigration and gender relations.

Read More

Alec Baldwin's 'black people love me' remark draws Twitter comparisons to President Trump

Alec Baldwin's 'black people love me' remark draws Twitter comparisons to President Trump
1Alec Baldwin says he’d beat Donald Trump in the 2020 election! Rob Smith (@robsmithonline) has all the details. Buzz60


The Twitterverse is wondering if Alec Baldwin has spent too much time portraying President Donald Trump on "Saturday Night Live."

In an interview published Wednesday, Baldwin, 60, told the Hollywood Reporter that "ever since I played Trump, black people love me." 

The actor continued: "I think it's because they're most afraid of Trump. I'm not going to paint every African-American person with the same brush, but a significant number of them are sitting there going, 'This is going to be bad for black folks.'"

His comments did not sit well with some social media users, who drew a starky comparison between Baldwin and the presidential character he portrays on "SNL."

"Predator" star Olivia Munn asked Baldwin for the "receipts."

"I need evidence of this. There are a lot of innocent black people you’re calling out and you shouldn’t be able to do it without receipts," she tweeted Wednesday. 



Read More

Donald Trump knows nothing about Medicare, health care or Democrats: Talker

Donald Trump knows nothing about Medicare, health care or Democrats: Talker
'Trump and his party are on a wildly unpopular mission to gut Medicare and protections for pre-existing conditions.'


USA TODAY Opinion published a column by President Donald Trump on Wednesday expressing his opposition to "Medicare for All" and Democrats' plans on health care. A roundup of reaction:

Trump, Republicans just hate Medicare
President Donald Trump’s column attacking "Medicare for All" was filled with falsehoods to distract voters from the truth: He and his party are on a wildly unpopular mission to gut Medicare and protections for pre-existing conditions.  

This year, House Republicans proposed to cut Medicare spending by $537 billion over the next 10 years. For many years, they have proposed to radically privatize Medicare into a voucher system, shifting costs to beneficiaries.

Immediately after passing trillions in tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, House Speaker Paul Ryan and the White House set their sights on Medicare. Last month, Trump’s National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow said, "As far as the larger entitlements, I think everybody is going to look at that probably next year."
Trump also lied about protecting people with pre-existing conditions and lowering Obamacare premiums. The Trump administration sided with Republican state attorneys general in their lawsuit to strike down the core protections. The Republican repeal bill would have decimated these protections by causing millions to lose coverage altogether; eliminating the federal guarantee of essential benefits such as prescription drug coverage; and allowing insurance companies to charge sicker and older people much higher premiums.

Related: Cuts in Social Security and Medicare are inevitable. Delaying reform will make it worse.

More: Half of America skimps to pay for health care. The only fix is to cut waste.

Senate Republicans have just voted down a Democratic bill that would have reversed the administration’s rollback of consumer protections. Trump’s "junk" plans — the Trump University of health insurance — can deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions, leaving them behind in a sicker insurance pool with higher premiums. Together with repeal of the individual mandate, nonpartisan experts estimate that these policies result in premiums that are much higher than they would be otherwise.

Far from harming Medicare beneficiaries, "Medicare for All" proposals represent the greatest advancement in financial security for seniors since Medicare was enacted in 1965. Whether everyone is enrolled in Medicare or Medicare is a guaranteed choice for all, these proposals enhance benefits for seniors, adding vision, dental and hearing benefits. They also lower drug prices and eliminate or dramatically reduce premiums and out-of-pocket costs for seniors.

Trump claims that Medicare for All would ration care and centralize health care decisions. This attack is absurd on its face: The current Medicare program is highly popular, and extending it to all would be no different. If Trump hates Medicare for All, the only logical conclusion is that he must hate Medicare itself.

Topher Spiro is the vice president for Health Policy at the Center for American Progress. You can follow him on Twitter: @TopherSpiro.

What our readers are saying
Comments from USA TODAY's Facebook group "Across the Aisle, Across the Nation":

As usual, President Donald Trump is lying in his column. He has done nothing to save our health care system and takes every opportunity to tear down Medicare. The health plan that he wanted the Republicans to pass would have us go back in time before Obamacare — including doing away with coverage of pre-existing conditions. 

— Diane Seligmann


Trump knows nothing about the working man or senior citizens' struggles. Here in Tennessee, his followers are mostly poor, uneducated people who don't even know what the Republican Party stands for. They are on welfare, get food stamps, Medicaid, but by God they are going to follow Trump! It blows my mind. 

— Susan Long Kuehl


First observation is that Trump is not intelligent enough to pen his own column. Second, nothing he spews at this point is believable. Third, he has polarized the health care debate and is out of touch with what would benefit the average American. Trump is so invested in making health care a commodity that he will never do the right thing.

— Brandi Stern


Total baloney. Universal health care works in every other modern nation. Trump is in bed with Big Pharma, the medical and insurance industries.

— John Steven Smith


Letter to the editor

President Donald Trump’s recent column attacking "Medicare for All" is laughable and riddled with "alternative facts."

Here are the real facts: Since taking office, Trump has done everything in his power to strip health care from millions of hardworking American families and seniors.

Unlike Trump, I’ve actually worked in health care. I know what happens when people go without care. Still today, I see cancer patients — including children — struggling to get the care they need. I’ve watched seniors take food out of their shopping carts because they couldn’t afford it and their prescriptions. And when it comes to health policy, that’s the lens that my Democratic colleagues and I use.

Sadly, for my Republican colleagues, it’s a lens of profits. They are wholly committed to making the most money possible off the sick and dying. That’s just wrong.

Trump’s "think piece" is nothing more than a sad attempt to rebrand his and congressional Republicans cruel and repeated attempts to take health care away from the American people. It won’t work. Seniors and American families are smart; they know who is on their side.

Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Ill., chair of the Congressional Black Caucus Health Braintrust; Washington, D.C.

What others are saying

James Freeman,  The Wall Street Journal: "Just like the Senate plan offered by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., the House measure, which is indeed co-sponsored by most House Democrats, does not allow capitalism in the health care industry. 'No institution may be a participating provider unless it is a public or not-for-profit institution,' says the plain language of H.R. 676. And how can we be sure that it replaces Medicare rather than leaving it alone? The official summary of the bill makes clear that Medicare money will be redirected to finance the new program. ... Health care is the must-win issue for Democrats. Now President Donald Trump is correctly explaining why SandersCare would be a loser for patients and taxpayers."

Paul Waldman,  The Washington Post: "Trump and the Republicans will defend Medicare from Democrats! If you believe that, you’ll hire an arsonist to protect your house from the fire department. The strangeness of this argument highlights a fundamental problem Republicans can’t get away from: They hate Medicare, but the American public loves Medicare. ... Because Medicare works extremely well and provides a valued benefit to tens of millions of politically potent citizens, it is impossible for them to unwind it as they would like to do. So every election, Democrats accuse them of wanting to destroy the program, which requires them to pretend that they actually love it and want to defend it."
Matthew Yglesias,  Vox: "This is the core lie of Trump’s op-ed. It is 100 percent true that the left wing of the Democratic Party is pushing a substantial change to the American health care system, and there are many legitimate qualms one might have with that change. But the proposal is to make Medicare more generous, not stingier, as Trump wants senior citizens to believe. Meanwhile, even though Trump himself maintains that he wants to avoid cuts to Medicare and Social Security, key members of his party — including senior figures in his own administration — keep pushing for cuts."
Read More